Sept. 6, 2012
It is truly eye-opening to consider the origins of “civilization,” and
hence, the birth of the “city” with which we are familiar. Even looking at a
map of the modern world and all its major cities, it is plainly obvious to see
the importance of a city’s proximity to either a major river or the sea. New York
City is by the sea, as is London, while Paris straddles the Seine just as an
ancient city would. As for the early cities of Mesopotamia, Egypt, and ancient
Rome, locations were chosen based on the suitability of the land and water
resources to provide for the people. The people who congregated into civil
groupings are the reason for the city, and gave rise to all human culture. As
said in “Discovering the Global Past,” the city itself is not the important
thing; the culture of the people is the real interesting part of the city.
Of course, it is debatable whether or not humans have a natural instinct
to band together, but when one considers the living world scientifically, the
more fragile members of the animal kingdom do in fact band together. Schools of
fish, flocks of birds, and dens of meerkats all find that there is in fact, “safety
in numbers.” For those that might think that humans are not fragile, think of
the following: Humans are, usually, no match for bears, lions, tigers, and other
land-based predators. However, in a group, with weapons of various levels of sophistication,
any animal on earth can be either trapped and/or killed. You have to imagine
that one of the very first lessons learned by early hominids was that they had
a much better chance at survival in a harsh, unforgiving world when everyone
worked together for the good of the society.
Most everyone knows that drinking water is vital for survival, but how
often does one think about how important irrigation of crops is to the survival
of the population? Especially today, when a consumer can go to the local
grocery store and select any kind of fresh produce imaginable – even items that
normally would not be locally available – how many people would give a second
thought to how and where the food was produced? Only recently have more people
made the conscious decision to know how and where their food is produced, but
even so, if you really, really want a peach and the only peaches available are
shipped in from thousands of miles away, how many people would say no? The first time a large group of people was
able to live comfortably and securely in a city, and have access to produce
grown by way of irrigation, the precedent was set, and the state of human
existence changed forever. The debate is whether the change was for the good or
the bad. I know what I believe, but who’s to say?
Then again, I never have attempted to “live off the land” for any long
period of time, so maybe I would enjoy it. Doubtful though – I have become used
to modern conveniences and technology the way an arctic penguin is used to
snow!
A comment on banning together.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me in the most basic sense that humans by definition like most of the animal population instinctly ban together. Now in a modern sense this does not carry and identical example to Neolithic or Paleolithic. The main difference in my opinion is the degrees of separation.
To this notion just by being a student one is inadvertently banning together with others and living in a pack mentality. I say this due to the definition of what I believe a pack is for. A pack created for the betterment of an individual through mutual symbiosis with others. The mutual benefits though in modern times may not be tangible but are none the less there. The student provides money for living while the professors provided information for the benefit of the student. Both grow and live off of each other. This type of pack living is based on mutual symbiosis but also done through varying degrees of physical separation. A farmer and butcher (gatherer hunter) inter-trade resources for boths advancement be it meat, animal food, or currency; thought on modern level these two may be separated by oceans. Yet they still have a pack based mentally due to the mutual symbiosis of both entities. In an over simplification it might be thought of as modern humans be international selective (relative to trade partners) pack animals.